Re: 85 trans am!!!
Depends on what your after. Those intakes you suggested are good for building torque more than HP (except LS6). LS6 is a great intake for mild bolt on's and even a little bit of N2O as long as you are under 150 shot. It is what I had and I'm now way past bolt ons so the LS6 is not enough for my goals with this build. FAST 102's are much better for the bigger ci builds. More air volume = more power when tune for it. Not trying to turn this into what's better argument.
Even though I do look at tech I'm not on there enough, on other sites more. What seems to be the current rage on tech is the Victor Jr intakes....
Travis - it still needs tune, I'll be doing speed density for couple of reasons; 1) I'm at sea level so no worries on DA issues, 2) I don't have to spend $500 on a large enough MAF and deal with a tuning nightmare getting it to work.
So where you moving too?
Depends on what your after. Those intakes you suggested are good for building torque more than HP (except LS6). LS6 is a great intake for mild bolt on's and even a little bit of N2O as long as you are under 150 shot. It is what I had and I'm now way past bolt ons so the LS6 is not enough for my goals with this build. FAST 102's are much better for the bigger ci builds. More air volume = more power when tune for it. Not trying to turn this into what's better argument.
Even though I do look at tech I'm not on there enough, on other sites more. What seems to be the current rage on tech is the Victor Jr intakes....
Travis - it still needs tune, I'll be doing speed density for couple of reasons; 1) I'm at sea level so no worries on DA issues, 2) I don't have to spend $500 on a large enough MAF and deal with a tuning nightmare getting it to work.
So where you moving too?


