ericspecullaas
New member
Son,
That was far from post of the year material.
![]()
ok dad i will edit it lol
Son,
That was far from post of the year material.
![]()
ok dad i will edit it lol
He prefers when you call him "Big Poppa".
He prefers when you call him "Big Poppa".
I don't know what your trying to prove here, im just asking why because your setup dosen't make any sense. My top swap'd gt made 250whp on a mustang dyno, stock pulley just a gen5 top swap with roller 1.9's on 93 pump with HEADERS. Why did you go through All the work swaping a cam, springs etc etc if your not going to pulley down?
suggesting injectors a smaller pulley and headers would make more hp is wrong...............................
OP stated he plans on doing 2 of the 3 and doesnt want to add headers fine well see what it makes no matter how you look at it its going to make more HP and TQ that it does currently.
Love for you to point out the wrong again............
He didn't ask for your advice.. you just keep telling him what he needs to do with his car. and he sure as hell doesn't need you blowing up this thread about how you could do everything better then he could. Then, as spade said, back pedal over everything you've said in this thread.
uts flame suite on:
IIRC people have used stock injectors up to around 300ish whp??
Dude your pretty annoying and I question your reading where have I said I could do everything better??
Simply asked why not change a few things how about you not acting like its so dramatic
Ohh and yet again I say heaven forbid someone ask a question clown.
You didn't say that out right. It's your "you're doing everything the wrong way" kind of attitude that's so ****ty here.
Oh, and to be annoying, it's you're annoying. :th_thumbsup-wink:
As for Explicits comment of all people IIRC it was douchflake that did so on the TVS build that was at or over 300 hp on stock injectors. Remember the drama in that fvckin mess????