TexasTanker19kilo20
Gun nut and III percenter
867-5309
Matt I think that number is older than you bro.
Tommy Tutone - Jenny (867-5309) (Original Studio) - YouTube
Matt-1993
Jenny(8675309)-1981
Last edited:
867-5309
Matt I think that number is older than you bro.
Tommy Tutone - Jenny (867-5309) (Original Studio) - YouTube
Matt-1993
Jenny(8765309)-1981
Headers would make very little difference in the torque this car makes
Maybe not however it will make a difference in the hp esp if you change the injectors and pulley down which in return would gain back whatever tq lost by adding headers still money well spent. I know you've built and had faster cars which still confuses me even more why you refuse to do the simple things to make the most from that xpz cam..........
Ohh and post the numbers it made already!
To what degree are the heads ported?
How many #'s are you seeing, like 3-4?
I'll say..
254whp/313wtq
Was expecting more TQ after all this no need for headers spew..........
How many #'s are you seeing, like 3-4?
And, I don't understand your other question.
Boost. Pounds. PSI.
I'm trying to picture how well your heads flow considering your cam profile and minimal s/c output.
Given what zzps site says for the cam it should support 3.0 on a non ic engine and the dyno sheet shown on that pages also shows 400 plus hp and 400 plus tq.
(yes I get it that car has way better heads is intercooled and on a way smaller pulley that's not my point)
given the info on the cam and staggered pushrod length for intake and exhaust. I can understand the engine hp and tq numbers climb almost parallel to each other. Which mirrors your hp and tq numbers.
All of this still makes me believe headers injectors and a smaller pulley with another tune obviously would make this car an entirely different animal!
Btw please explain how injectors and a smaller pulley would help when its still being choked out? Can't cram more air in if you can't get it out.......