Spend 450$ on a exhaust for a 3100, are you serious??-I quote!
I have seen this response often on this and other threads. You guys need to get real about the differences between a 3.1 and 3.8 normally aspirated-THERE IS NOT A BIG DIFFERENCE IN THESE MOTORS!!!! Essentially a 3.8 is a slightly bored 3.1 that makes 25 horsepower more than my 3.1. How do i know this FACT other than looking at the specs is that I have had 3.8's in a 97 GT, 2004 Impala LS, and currently in a 2001 Buick-Wake up-The 3.8 versus the 3.1 is not like comparing an old chevy straight 6 to a 427 V8-There is very difference between a 3.8 and 3.1 and even a lesser difference in HP!
the 3100 and 3400 is a 60* v6, isnt the 3800 a 90* v6? o yea...TOTALLY THE SAME MOTOR right?
The first engine in this family was introduced in 1961 with Buick's 198 cu in (3.2 L) engine, the first V6 in an American car. Because it was derived from Buick's 215 cu in (3.5 L) aluminum V8, it has a 90° bank between cylinders and an odd-fire firing pattern that include the two 'phantom' cylinders from the V8 pattern.
The General Motors 60° V6 family of engines began with the 1980 Chevrolet 2.8 L V6 and continues to be produced today (if one doesn't count a larger block casting with larger bore center and new cylinder heads). Its use in the X-body cars leads some to refer to it as the X engine.
Let me slide? Thanks? The resonator gets rid of the drone dude...I've been there too...not like your the only one who has ever put exhaust on cars. Hence the name...it controls the RESONANCE of the sound. Sure...the converter might get rid of some of the rasp...But 50 times to 1...a 3800 car with a deleted res. sounds like epic crap compared to a cat deleted one...you should know this.
:th_laugh-pointup:
Shows you what you really know...there is A LOT of things different.
HA I'd rather have the Iron Duke over the 3.1 Both are Turds!
bluegtp91, I'm proud that you can spell resonance, truly I am. I guess that's better than the previous name calling. If you don't think a catalytic converter affects sound as much as a resonator, fine. They're all components in a system but something down the line is picking up the slack of the cat delete.
Also one very important thing, a resonator is considered an additional muffler, taking care of whatever resonance the primary muffler can't handle. Therefore you get the right muffler in the first place instead of taking the word of the internet gurus or some low quality clip on youtube. Maybe thats why gutted cat cars sound good? Good combo of muffler and resonator? Just forget about the benefits of a cat. Or if he knows of a shop that will install a catless dp if he doesn't have the ability.
I'm not sure what chances 50:1 have with anything but letting a shop remove his res, hearing that then making the choice to leave it off or simply having it welded back on is better than spending money on a set of mufflers that he might hate and be stuck with. Or even better, see what the shop has in stock and have them slip fitted to hear before he buys? He said he didn't want to spend 800$, I took that as "what can I do for cheap?"
Ive put my opinion in, I've listened to yours. There we go.
Besides the measily 25 HP difference between the 3.8 and 3.1, the 3.1 sounds better to boot!!!! A big difference in the engines is 50-100 HP. Is that the difference or should I look it up on wikipedia? Like I said, 25 HP, you guys are totally delusional about real differences here in the motors.
Besides the measily 25 HP difference between the 3.8 and 3.1, the 3.1 sounds better to boot!!!! A big difference in the engines is 50-100 HP. Is that the difference or should I look it up on wikipedia? Like I said, 25 HP, you guys are totally delusional about real differences here in the motors.
Oh yeah, one more salient fact that is mentioned numerous times, "one is 60 degree and the other is 90 degree engine", and your point is? Neither engine is a high performance motor that likes to rev, neither! Like I said all those big differences amount to 25 HP advantage on the 3.8 with , 0.7 liter more displacement than the 3.1! So let's all do the math here, for 0.7 liter more displacement one V6 picks up 25 HP over the 3.1. Real high tech stuff here. Get real!!
Whatever the differences are between a 3.1 and 3.8, the FACT remains that it is ONLY 25 HP!!!! Think about that!!!
Besides the measily 25 HP difference between the 3.8 and 3.1, the 3.1 sounds better to boot!!!! A big difference in the engines is 50-100 HP. Is that the difference or should I look it up on wikipedia? Like I said, 25 HP, you guys are totally delusional about real differences here in the motors.
Oh yeah, one more salient fact that is mentioned numerous times, "one is 60 degree and the other is 90 degree engine", and your point is? Neither engine is a high performance motor that likes to rev, neither! Like I said all those big differences amount to 25 HP advantage on the 3.8 with , 0.7 liter more displacement than the 3.1! So let's all do the math here, for 0.7 liter more displacement one V6 picks up 25 HP over the 3.1. Real high tech stuff here. Get real!!
You guys need to get real about the differences between a 3.1 and 3.8 normally aspirated-THERE IS NOT A BIG DIFFERENCE IN THESE MOTORS!!!!