i daily drive a CTS-V, how can i hate american muscle? you cray.
i love the idea of the new GNX, but reversing time and putting something the opposite of modern in it for nostalgia sake is pure retardism.
if i turn it upside down then it's OHC. now who's the smart guy?
this is the internet. no one knows you're a dog on the internet. no one.
the n/a 3.6 makes 300hp so 2 turbos only add 100hp maybe little more? doesnt sound rightAccording to the article, the GXN will be a twin turbo 3.6L V6 rated at 400+hp.
the n/a 3.6 makes 300hp so 2 turbos only add 100hp maybe little more? doesnt sound right
Wut.
Obviously lower compression, so that would lower output.
Obviously doesn't have stupid manifold in head design.
It's the same as the V-Sport...if they even make it. They're probably K04's of the like or even a smidge smaller. The V-Sport makes a "rated" 420~hp/430 TQ...and the standard 3.6 DOHC is 300~/270TQ. Which is 120+HP/160TQ over stock. That isn't that bad at all considering the lower psi #'s...you just have to compare.
It's the same as the V-Sport...if they even make it.
Wut.
Obviously lower compression, so that would lower output.
Obviously doesn't have stupid manifold in head design.
It's the same as the V-Sport...if they even make it. They're probably K04's of the like or even a smidge smaller. The V-Sport makes a "rated" 420~hp/430 TQ...and the standard 3.6 DOHC is 300~/270TQ. Which is 120+HP/160TQ over stock. That isn't that bad at all considering the lower psi #'s...you just have to compare.