What I dont get is this...
You claim that a 100degree drop in temperature at the snout is going to show huge gains...
Never said HUGE gains so don't misquote me
The fact is the phenolic intercoolers we have had for years and years will drop ENTIRE blower temperatures well more than 100 degrees, as it is not directly connected to an engine running at 200 degrees. While the phenolics have shown some gains over aluminium, they were nowhere near worth the extra cost and hassle of phenolic over aluminum... as the gains were in the 2whp area in, which were exclusive to specific situations. It has been proven time and time again that a cooler blower will not drop blower outlet temperatures, so by saying that a cooler snout would ever drop blower outlet temps is just significantly more insane.
A phenolic intercooler will insulate the supercharger from engine heat but not "cool" the supercharger per se. And comparing this to a glory run on a dyno versus everyday realworld driving where heat soak becomes in issue is really apples to oranges. And you are saying a cooler supercharger would'nt reduce IAT's where we have datalogged proof that it does so I don't see the "insanity" in that. Insane is arguing against the factual data provided on Bobs site.
Also, the phenolic intercoolers kept the case part cool to the touch, but the snout was still a bit hot to the point where you couldnt rest your hand on isolated parts of it for any length of time. This is still signfiicantly cooler than the 200+ degrees a stock blower/stock car operates at.
So.....now you're saying that "the snout was still a bit hot to the point where you couldn't rest your hand on it" but it's not hot? And frankly, hot engine = good combustion, hot blower = less dense air charge.