Sabrewings
New member
i couldn't find a post specific on how to install one of these. is it just something you plug in somewhere on the car and thats it?
Pretty much.
i couldn't find a post specific on how to install one of these. is it just something you plug in somewhere on the car and thats it?
flip quoted me $80 thats if u supply him with the tails, it all depends on how you want them done too, if he has to use his tails it's something like $200 something for core charge.
As mods go...if I could do it all over again...I would get in any order really...
180* Thermostat
Autolite 104 Spark Plugs
PRJ 10.4mm Wires
SLP/ZZP/Pacesetter/SS Autochrome Headers (Any of them work)
Some form of Intake (K&N is junk and the SLP/Wizaird/MSP aint great either)...make your own for $50 or so...
Tuned PCM of your choice.
3.5" or 3.4" Pulley. If you want to mod past this then opt for the ZZ Performance Modular Pulley System.
Hope this helps.
i couldn't find a post specific on how to install one of these. is it just something you plug in somewhere on the car and thats it?
is the much more of a benefit to putting in a 160* thermostat instead. also has anyone had to put in a high flow fuel filter to keep KR down?
There is no such thing as a "high-flow" fuel filter. ZZP feeds people a bunch of crap on that one...someone on KCPMC had tested it awhile back. If you are going to swap a fuel filter just get a new GM one.
As for the 160* T-Stat, probably not that much of a difference keeping KR down, sure it will keep the motor a bit colder. The T-Stat temp is more so just personal preference. Only reason I have one is for all of my mods. But when the temps get colder than 50* or so outside I go back to a 180* and when they hit 50*-60* consistently in the spring, I put the 160* back in.
ive talked to will (overkill) a good bit. ill agree tho, sometimes he dont answer back at first, but i just forward the message back to him. hes a cool guy once you get talking to him. ive wasted alot of his time myself just chit-chating about tuning.
i kinda figured that cuz i have never heard of that before, and with all the old cars ive had, ive done plenty of the basic filter change. you would think it would have to be bigger anyway.
well, in florida 60* is cold to most people so i might just put a 160* in. the colder the engine, the better.
also, does anyone know if they make this scanner for 97-03, (ZZ Performance) cuz it seems pretty cool, but its only for 05+:, i thought it was pretty nice that it can tell you 0-60 times and max speeds and all that, but the main reason to get it is for the scanning, so is the aeroforce still better?
the colder the engine, the better.
Very wrong. Engine wear increases as temps drop. The difference in wear on the cylinder walls between a 180* and a 160* is substantial and can be measured if you pull the engine. That is why I personally don't run a 160*.
Info for some to chew on:
Low temp Thermostats and engine wear [Archive] - LX Forums Modern Mopar Muscle
HOTRODSRJ’s COOLING TIPS Operating temperature vs power and longevity!
Optimum wear and performance balances out around a 180* coolant temp, which with my 180* my temps are usually about 179* or up to 190* in traffic.