• The site migration is complete! Hopefully everything transferred properly from the multiple decades old software we were using before. If you notice any issues please let me know, thanks! Also, I'm still working on things like chatbox, etc so hopefully those will be working in the next week or two.

TVS Regal going to the dyno again!

Status
Not open for further replies.
I do. Do you? I am saying that you can't just say a TVS blower is better because it works on other cars that are no way close to ours. I agree it is a better blower but you are making correlations that have no substance or merit at all.

You have zero fundamental understanding on how PD blowers work. Please educate yourself.
 


You have zero fundamental understanding on how PD blowers work. Please educate yourself.

If you say it then it must be true. lol

2010_10_dickwad.jpg
 
Last edited:
So a more efficient blower swap on another car (assuming the blower displacement is the same or near it), does not mean putting said blower on another car with a less efficient blower will make more power? Sure the gains may not be the same, but come on. Gains will be there just the same.
 
Srsly? LOL. Go read the thread... it was a clear joke, right from the start. Everyone got all up in arms and I think ONE person kept a level head and asked what was really done. You think I was actually trying to claim a mid 13 second pass in a showroom stock Regal? You need to see what I was really doing... a satirical comment on how other people define stock. If you remember, at the time there was a bunch of threads going about "stock" GTPs running fast times. Those "stock" GTPs had things like slicks, tunes, dropped exhausts, weight reduction, etc, etc...

I was there and followed the whole thread. You can call it whatever you want. And you may have meant it to be a joke from the beginning. But it doesn't change the fact that for weeks you lead people on with your wild and completely misleading claims. I've said it before, and I will say it again. You thrive on the internet on the controversy that you can create around yourself. You love the attention and feed off of it. Yeah, you can look back and that thread and tell people you were joking from the beginning. But the fact of the matter is the stunts you pulled ruined your own reputation. You may be a good, upstanding guy in real life. But for people that haven't met you and will never meet you, your past performance on these forums precedes you as a misleading person that tells half-truths just to get a rise out of people.
 
Zef... let's be serious here. The thread was debunked in less than 24 hours. There was no charade going for "weeks". I understand that people aren't going to like me, and that's fine. All I ask is that if you don't like me, at least have the right reasons for taking that position.

In context, that thread was in response to all the BS on clubgp. Like I said, a satirical comment on the forum (and the internet as a whole) about how desensitized, out of touch, and convoluted everyone seems to be. What triggered it was a bunch of threads that had popped up in the racing stories section about "stock" GTPs running insanely quick times for "stock". Then people actually sat at their computers and defended their position that the car was "stock" after they listed a bunch of mods.

I pulled the same **** over on the GTO board. For TWO YEARS, I had my 12.54 @ 112 listed under the "super stock" category. My mods at the time were nitto drag radials and a catback, perfectly in line with what was acceptable under the rules of "super stock". However, some fat mouth, cocky, arrogant prick had "FASTEST STOCK GTO EVER" all over his signature. It turns out he ran at Atco (no surprise there) with drag radials and weight reduction. His time was a 12.7 @ 108. I contested that weight reduction and DR's does not equal "stock" he should be listed in the "super stock" category.

All the GTO guys jumped on me saying his car was "stock", so I then switched my own cars listing out of "super stock" to "stock". My time was faster than his... so I asked him to take the BS out of his signature.

My point is that I'm actually on the same side of the fence as everyone who thought I was misleading them on the issue of what's stock and what isn't. You can spin it into saying I'm just an attention whore and I like to **** with people... but the truth is that I believe in the truth, and nothing riles people up more than the truth.

The TVS is, the truth.
 


The TVS is a better blower than the GenV....

But going from 93 to Ethanol 105-109 octane some credit is due there there as well.
 
Definitely... But all those guys on the high HP list have heads/IC and e85 or race gas.
I made 350whp on 93, so I'm hoping to pick up good.
 
I want to see a stock car (probably with headers of course for flow reasons)...go to the dyno with a pump 91 setup.

Then throw on a TVS...

Change nothing except the proper pulley size for the car...

And dyno it again.

Then I'll be a believer.
 
I want to see a stock car (probably with headers of course for flow reasons)...go to the dyno with a pump 91 setup.

Then throw on a TVS...

Change nothing except the proper pulley size for the car...

And dyno it again.

Then I'll be a believer.

Amen
 


People who have been against this from day one will never believe. No matter how much power I make or how fast the car goes at the track...
 
People who have been against this from day one will never believe. No matter how much power I make or how fast the car goes at the track...

I want to see a stock car (probably with headers of course for flow reasons)...go to the dyno with a pump 91 setup.

Then throw on a TVS...

Change nothing except the proper pulley size for the car...

And dyno it again.

Then I'll be a believer.

...
 
Please see NE thread for ongoing dyno info w/o trolling etc, that will be kept clean This thread is no longer productive.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top