Turbo VW GOLF

[Juanmiguel]

Talk to me again whe you take it to 5000 ft and run anywhere near low 15s. Besides that its just talk. Looks like you also ran out of options to keep up with a normal discussion an recurred to plain insults so i wont bother on answering to you anymore as this wont lead this thread anywhere but down.

 

[stealthee]

You took it from a normal conversation when you covered your ears and went "lalalalala can't hear you"

There is SCIENCE behind NHRA's altitude corrections. Its not "just some page on the internet" They see THOUSANDS of cars at many different altitudes every year and their corrections are pretty spot on. Including the 1/2 factor. Just because you don't like the actual correction, doesn't make it wrong.

And I drive at all kinds of elevations. I live in the friggin mountains. I've seen myself how elevation affects different cars. I've also seen the same turbo car run virtually the same time at 2500 feet and then again at sea level.

You never answered the addition questions about your trap speed and 60'.

 

[Someone Much Cooler]

good kill. Euro cars are fun to beat

 

[blueguy]

You never answered the addition questions about your trap speed and 60'.

This is the only thing I care about in both of you peoples gripe fest...from all the track times you posted...

I want to see some slips, that's all.

 

[TheNoob23]

You never answered the addition questions about your trap speed and 60'.

I don't know about other stats since the idiots at the track only enable ET and RT... I don't know why, not even trap speed. Anyway mine is at around 150-160 kmh whatever that is in mph. The GTP shifts into 3rd gear @5900 rpm like a second before reaching the finish line with stock ratio.

read much?

 

[Juanmiguel]

yeah there, isn't much to see in it except the reaction time and the ET:

I posted this one a while back when I was almost stock I think. juding by the ET, but it essentially has the same information as the one I got the other night:

 

[blueguy]

Is that a 1.89 60 foot?

Your espanol el time slip-o's confuse me.

 

[Juanmiguel]

Is that a 1.89 60 foot?

Your espanol el time slip-o's confuse me.

probably yes, it means "time 20 meters", should be about 60ft. Although the 200mt (1/8 ET) time is the same as the one in 20 meters.

v. final = trap speed
t. recor = 1/4 ET
t. reac = RT

edit:

oh and well the 60 ft time is in the negatives always. Not sure I can tell if -1.88 is better than -1.89 in this case, but I'll compare it to last weekend's 60ft time.

 

[Juanmiguel]

ok this one is from last Friday, mine is the one on the right. 60ft would be -1.985

 

[07CurbScraper]

Good kill. I like when cocky car owners are humbled.