130's are not needed.
105's are plenty...also, running a stock chain/dampner is fine as well on 105's or 90's.
It is hit and miss with both...which is why I trust neither.
In the end...your wallet...so, your call.
Just giving you my side of things...that's all man.
1.6 roller tip rockers will make about 25-30whp less than stock rockers, as well as float your valves much sooner.
105s float on s1x and XP cam cars passed 5800rpms or so.. its not the end of the world but you lose quite a bit of power.
I wouldnt trust an LS6 spring lift wise on a xp/s1x. Good chance you will be running into coil bind.
I can't see how that's possible. Rollers are easier on the valves then stock rockers. The motor should rev easier with the rollers.
Where are you getting this info from? I've been told by many people that 105s are just fine. I was taken for a ride just the other day in a buddy's gtp that has an xp and 105s and it would not stop making power even at nearly 6500rpms
motor's he's measured IIRC.
Stock rocker ratio changes at high lift.
motor's he's measured IIRC.
yes.
costs less too.
With no proof other than heresay.
Plenty of people have ran 105's/LS6's without issues for years.
I was taken for a ride just the other day in a buddy's gtp that has an xp and 105s and it would not stop making power even at nearly 6500rpms
I dont know a single person that has never had issues related to too much lift and not enough clearance using these parts... Remember everyone breaking valvesprings not to long ago?