well chatted with gibson online and he suggested throwing the 3.4 and unplug the alky and retune and see where my actual AFR is at. after a few tweaks under the PE vs Time and changed the commanded AFR from 11.3 to 11.9 heres the results:
WB showed a range of 10.1-10.5
no alky- NO-ALKY WB-10.1_TO_10.4 (02.25 from fst100 -- Scan Depot dot net
now after i pulled over and reconnected the wires to the alky controller i went out and lowered the fuel via AFC by -1 from 8-11 and came upon the results:
WB showed a range of 10.2-10.5
with alky- WITH ALKY WB-10.5 02.25.2008_1 from fst100 -- Scan Depot dot net
this is with the PLX SMR-AFR. i dont know if the WB is off or not, but i remember there was a link of where this magazine article compared all the brand name WBs and put them to a test. long story short, the PLX brand had one of the worse accurancies, ranging +/-1.0:th_shakinghead2:. do u think this is the case or maybe i need to tweak the tune more to match the commanded AFR with the actual?
WB showed a range of 10.1-10.5
no alky- NO-ALKY WB-10.1_TO_10.4 (02.25 from fst100 -- Scan Depot dot net
now after i pulled over and reconnected the wires to the alky controller i went out and lowered the fuel via AFC by -1 from 8-11 and came upon the results:
WB showed a range of 10.2-10.5
with alky- WITH ALKY WB-10.5 02.25.2008_1 from fst100 -- Scan Depot dot net
this is with the PLX SMR-AFR. i dont know if the WB is off or not, but i remember there was a link of where this magazine article compared all the brand name WBs and put them to a test. long story short, the PLX brand had one of the worse accurancies, ranging +/-1.0:th_shakinghead2:. do u think this is the case or maybe i need to tweak the tune more to match the commanded AFR with the actual?