• The site migration is complete! Hopefully everything transferred properly from the multiple decades old software we were using before. If you notice any issues please let me know, thanks! Also, I'm still working on things like chatbox, etc so hopefully those will be working in the next week or two.

It's 2010, let's move on...........

Binary Anyone:

0100111101001011001000000111010001101000011010010111001100100000011101000110100001110010011001010110000101100100001000000110100101110011001000000111011101100001011110010010000001110100011011110010000001100001011001000111011001100001011011100110001101100101011001000010000001100110011011110111001000100000011011010110010100100000010010010010000001100100011011110110111001110100001000000110010101110110011001010110111000100000011101010110111001100100011001010111001001110011011101000110000101101110011001000010000001101000011000010110110001100110001000000110111101100110001000000110100101110100001011100010111000100000010001110111010101100101011100110111001100100000010010010010000001101000011000010111011001100101001000000111010001101111001000000110001001110010011001010110000101101011001000000110111101110101011101000010000001110100011010000110010100100000011000100110100101101110011000010111001001111001001000000110001101101111011001000110010100100001
 


alright well i loved the hangover but unfortunately i have no memory of movies. once i see it, i forget everything
 


SnowDrift said:
wikipedia - the liberal dictionary (no thank you - I'm FAR from liberal)

Back to the topic...
Click to expand...

Wtf. :th_scratchhead:

Its been proven to be more accurate than most sources on the internet, but spotty on history.

Also, its a great resource if you need help with understanding a scientific subject.
 
matt5112 said:
Wtf. :th_scratchhead:

Its been proven to be more accurate than most sources on the internet, but spotty on history.

Also, its a great resource if you need help with understanding a scientific subject.
Click to expand...

It's a good source of information, for the most part. It's owned by a liberal couple, though, so some of the information is filtered through liberal minds. Just like anything else - it's good to know the source:th_thumb-up:.
 
SnowDrift said:
It's a good source of information, for the most part. It's owned by a liberal couple, though, so some of the information is filtered through liberal minds. Just like anything else - it's good to know the source:th_thumb-up:.
Click to expand...

I'm well aware of that. Getting the truth is still difficult in this "modern" age. :th_jester:
 
SnowDrift said:
It's a good source of information, for the most part. It's owned by a liberal couple, though, so some of the information is filtered through liberal minds. Just like anything else - it's good to know the source:th_thumb-up:.
Click to expand...

Anyone can edit any part of information at any time. How do you figure all of it is filtered through this "liberal couple"?
 


xDetroitMetalx said:
Anyone can edit any part of information at any time. How do you figure all of it is filtered through this "liberal couple"?
Click to expand...

I've read it on several conservative news sources and found it to be true. World Net Daily is only one that cited examples of their liberal bias. Here's another example in this link. Liberal Bias at Wikipedia? | NewsBusters.org

Perhaps Wales is divorced now, so maybe it's not owned by a couple. It looks like his partner, though, left the business because of the political and social agenda it was promoting (assuming what I read about him ON wikipedia is true)

I think this discussion has gotten a little off topic, though, from the original poster's comments. If someone wants to keep ranting about wikipedia, then there should be a new thread started for that specific purpose. Sorry for the hijack.

Respectfully,
SnowDrift
 
SnowDrift said:
I've read it on several conservative news sources and found it to be true. World Net Daily is only one that cited examples of their liberal bias. Here's another example in this link. Liberal Bias at Wikipedia? | NewsBusters.org

Perhaps Wales is divorced now, so maybe it's not owned by a couple. It looks like his partner, though, left the business because of the political and social agenda it was promoting (assuming what I read about him ON wikipedia is true)

I think this discussion has gotten a little off topic, though, from the original poster's comments. If someone wants to keep ranting about wikipedia, then there should be a new thread started for that specific purpose. Sorry for the hijack.

Respectfully,
SnowDrift
Click to expand...

How is using their "enemies" information getting you a more truthful impressive of them when they sit on other sides of the fence?:rolleyes:

Reading that is hilarious, the interviewer gives off the impression that wikipedia is ONLY for the US and should represent them, not other countries...

What people fail to understand is that the people who use and contribute to wikipedia will be the ones who control it.

If you had more conservative than liberal people controlling it, then it'd swing the other way and you wouldn't have a problem with it. :rolleyes:
 


You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top