• The site migration is complete! Hopefully everything transferred properly from the multiple decades old software we were using before. If you notice any issues please let me know, thanks! Also, I'm still working on things like chatbox, etc so hopefully those will be working in the next week or two.

Dyno Results

All this thread did is lower my braincells haha i love these arguments there entertaining

Sent from my Motorola Electrify using Tapatalk
 




Explicit_Spade said:
How do you call a cam, headers, N*, 2.8 pullied motor just a cam-only motor, even "for short"?

You say nothing of relevance changed between 299 on the gen v and 350 on the TVS, but you changed injectors and a fuel pump. If you were out flowing the injectors AND pump on the TVS, how were you not on the Gen v?

What does your 350WHP Street Tune have for timing?

Was E-60 used on both gen V and TVS dynos?

Edit: How many PSI were you seeing on each S/C?
Click to expand...

Bumping my unanswered questions.
 
Nope. Maybe if you had hard facts to stand behind you would have answered my questions by now. You wanna sit here and say that your TVS is so incredible, but you have no facts to put behind it.

You not only added a twin screw blower, but you also swapped to "e-60", bigger injectors, a better pump. Who is to say that your factory injectors or factory pump weren't the issues in the first place?

If you want to make a supercharger comparison, make a fair comparison with factual evidence instead of this half-assed "I think I'm better than you" bull**** that is spewed throughout this thread.
 


Explicit_Spade said:
Nope. Maybe if you had hard facts to stand behind you would have answered my questions by now. You wanna sit here and say that your TVS is so incredible, but you have no facts to put behind it.

You not only added a twin screw blower, but you also swapped to "e-60", bigger injectors, a better pump. Who is to say that your factory injectors or factory pump weren't the issues in the first place?

If you want to make a supercharger comparison, make a fair comparison with factual evidence instead of this half-assed "I think I'm better than you" bull**** that is spewed throughout this thread.
Click to expand...

The amount of fail in this post is epic.
Why don't you go look at post #140, and then check to see what kind of blower a TVS is.
 
That's because you don't see reality.

I'm going to back out of this thread, since you won't answer my questions and have no hard facts anyway. When you grow up and decide to stop writing these fictional stories, let me know.
 
Explicit_Spade said:
That's because you don't see reality.

I'm going to back out of this thread, since you won't answer my questions and have no hard facts anyway. When you grow up and decide to stop writing these fictional stories, let me know.
Click to expand...

You're so stupid that I am at a loss for words. How can you effectively comprehend the overwhelming proof if you can't even read?
 


Mkay, looks like I'll stick around this thread and play till it's locked since that's clearly what you want.

Look at the questions I want answered, then go copy and paste a quote of what you said in the first thread and Change the color to red where the answers are.

You won't because the answers aren't there. Don't tell me I can't read when there's nothing to be read.
 
SnowFlake said:
The amount of fail in this post is epic.
Why don't you go look at post #140, and then check to see what kind of blower a TVS is.
Click to expand...
Explicit_Spade said:
How do you call a cam, headers, N*, 2.8 pullied motor just a cam-only motor, even "for short"? cam-only means the engine only has a cam... obviously everything else is clearly listed.

You say nothing of relevance changed between 299 on the gen v and 350 on the TVS, but you changed injectors and a fuel pump. If you were out flowing the injectors AND pump on the TVS, how were you not on the Gen v? the injector and pump issues were irrelevant because the limiting factor was knock, not fuel. the TVS flows more air and boost before knock is a limiting factor, therefor fuel became an issue when more air was introduced.

What does your 350WHP Street Tune have for timing? Something like 16 degrees.

Was E-60 used on both gen V and TVS dynos? No. This is abundantly clear in every post. I've gone over exactly what each dyno run consisted of at least 68 times.

Edit: How many PSI were you seeing on each S/C? 11-12psi on the GenV. 14-15psi on the TVS. 11-12psi on the TVS with open down pipe.
Click to expand...

Everything you just asked has been gone over COUNTLESS times.
Click to expand...

POST 140 IN THIS THREAD

My god, is there anyone with a brain????

Explicit_Spade said:
Mkay, looks like I'll stick around this thread and play till it's locked since that's clearly what you want.

Look at the questions I want answered, then go copy and paste a quote of what you said in the first thread and Change the color to red where the answers are.

You won't because the answers aren't there. Don't tell me I can't read when there's nothing to be read.
Click to expand...

You fail SO HARD that I would SERIOUSLY consider seeing a doctor. We're at the point where it's not even funny or amusing anymore... its ****ing disturbing.
 
You said all this was in post 1 NUMEROUS times, did you not? I wasn't about to read through 10 pages of bull**** for it.

Clearly the gains are from the E-60, injectors and pump with more boost. Just as effectively you could have put on a 2.6 with fueling changes on the Gen V and saved yourself 2 grand.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top