Less boost is actually better.
to a certain extent...
Just think of boost as a girl... you dont wanna have sex with the 200lb girl, but you dont want an anorexic girl either right?
its all about finding something in the middle that works best for you![]()
To a certain extent? What do you mean? The less boost the more effecienctly it's flowing.
In the case of this cam it allowed more flow, thus less boost. You already know that.
Im confused why you think boost needs to be in the middle. The lower your boost the better the system if flowing.(Usually. You could have a vac leak but that's diff)
Boost doesn't mean a whole lot. It tells you how good(or bad) your system flows.
these cars are best at around 12psi
To a certain extent? What do you mean? The less boost the more effecienctly it's flowing.
In the case of this cam it allowed more flow, thus less boost. You already know that.
Im confused why you think boost needs to be in the middle. The lower your boost the better the system if flowing.(Usually. You could have a vac leak but that's diff)
Boost doesn't mean a whole lot. It tells you how good(or bad) your system flows.
I kind of understand how my logic is flawed.
I do understand that 6-8 PSI on a 3.8" and a 3.0" is diff though. A 3.0" running the same "boost" as a 3.8" is gonna make more power..at least theoretically it should.
But given a certain pulley size. We'll say a 3.0". If your making 8 PSI vs 5 PSI the 5 PSI may be less "boost" BUT it should be a colder boost and create more power, once again, int theory. Correct? Or am I wrong?