• The site migration is complete! Hopefully everything transferred properly from the multiple decades old software we were using before. If you notice any issues please let me know, thanks! Also, I'm still working on things like chatbox, etc so hopefully those will be working in the next week or two.

180* T-stat

J_Man55

New member
Thinking about buying the zzp 180* t-stat. How will my PCM react if I install this? Do I need a custom PCM and/or have my PCM tuned to the 180* t-stat? Is the t-stat easy to install? Write-ups or tutorials?



Random question: My car shifts gears at around 2500 or 3000 rpms, is this normal?
 


Thinking about buying the zzp 180* t-stat. How will my PCM react if I install this? Do I need a custom PCM and/or have my PCM tuned to the 180* t-stat? Is the t-stat easy to install? Write-ups or tutorials?



Random question: My car shifts gears at around 2500 or 3000 rpms, is this normal?

You don't need to reprogram anything with the PCM to run a different thermostat.

And yeah, the thermostat is very, very, very easy to install. It's just the two bolts on the thermostat housing, and thats it.



BTW: Your car shifts gears at any RPM when it's time, depending on how much throttle your giving it.
 
Thinking about buying the zzp 180* t-stat. How will my PCM react if I install this? Do I need a custom PCM and/or have my PCM tuned to the 180* t-stat? Is the t-stat easy to install? Write-ups or tutorials?

Before you go and buy the t-stat, think about why you want to install this. If you don't know why, then do some research and find out the benefits and downsides to the mods.

Personally, I am running a stock 195° stat right now because I am most concerned with fuel mileage. I have found that a 180° stat in a daily driver will cause me lower fuel mileage. I do convert over to a 180° stat when at the track. But for everyday use, I keep a stock stat in it.
 
yea about the 180 tstat i recently asked people on here what is soo good about it? Plus my GTP is a daily driver and it will lower your MPG and will not gain hardly an HP so its a waste of 10 bucks. take the 10 bucks and put it in your gas tank =]
 


I have noticed a decrease in MPG with a 180 stat. I may switch back soon. Heck I may not even install the 3.4 pulley and stuff I ordered.
 
Over 100 years of engine research has determined that ~195* is the ideal temperature for combustion. But my GP still runs cold with a 195*. Either that, or my temperature gauge ain't right...
 
How do you know its running cold? I used to think halfway on the Impala's gauge was 200, but according to my scanner 200 is a notch or so left of the half mark.

Point is, temperature gauges don't scale linearly. My trucks were like that (100 at the bottom, 210 middle, 260 at the highest), but I thought cars were different. Apparently not.
 
Before you go and buy the t-stat, think about why you want to install this. If you don't know why, then do some research and find out the benefits and downsides to the mods.

Personally, I am running a stock 195° stat right now because I am most concerned with fuel mileage. I have found that a 180° stat in a daily driver will cause me lower fuel mileage. I do convert over to a 180° stat when at the track. But for everyday use, I keep a stock stat in it.


I am quite curious as to how much actual fuel savings there is with the 195 as compared to the 180 Tstat. Numbers or estimated MPG's would be great :)

Thanks!
 
Zef, so your saying that you'll spend hundreds of dollars modding your GTP but won't risk losing a few tenths off your mpg by going down to a 180* tstat? Weird. Also I'm pretty sure that you do have to change your PCM (or just a setting in it) to benefit from your 180* tstat.
 


On the highway the car will run a little cooler with a 180 on stock pcm. Because the air flow threw the radiator is enough to cool it. But in stop/go the fans will keep it at stock temp.

I'm curious to see if my gauge is right. It seems low. The ls1m should tell me I guess.
 
@ 65 MPH through IL, I got 33 MPG with a 180*.

fwiw, with my fans set to match my 180, my temps stay between 186 and 175.
 
Zef, so your saying that you'll spend hundreds of dollars modding your GTP but won't risk losing a few tenths off your mpg by going down to a 180* tstat? Weird. Also I'm pretty sure that you do have to change your PCM (or just a setting in it) to benefit from your 180* tstat.

What's the point of the 180* tstat though? He's right that engines are most efficient (and thus make the most power) at 195*. So, why have the 180*?
 
I am quite curious as to how much actual fuel savings there is with the 195 as compared to the 180 Tstat. Numbers or estimated MPG's would be great :)

Thanks!

I know for a fact I lost a 2-3 MPG on my last trip home (about 5.5 hours) due to a 180* tstat. Highway mileage has returned to normal since returning to the stock temperature.
 


Last edited:
Cooler engine normally means better performance & reduced knock.

Better performance... I question that. Reduced knock... That's what I have a tuner for.

My point is, why sacrifice efficiency in the pursuit of power if you don't have to?
 
There is nothing wrong with looking for the balance between performance and efficiency.
The Road and Track take (you can find similar non Internet forum articles everywhere).

Engine-management computers rely on the as-designed coolant temperature (typically 193 degrees F) to better atomize fuel, maintain heat-exchanger efficiency, provide lower emissions, optimize fuel economy and other factors, so running the engine colder than designed can have multiple ill effects. These are the sort of effects that are not immediately apparent, so such issues are more long-term durability concerns.

Tuners often fit 180-degree F thermostats to give hot-rodded engines a larger cooling margin for when they’re making tons of heat (horsepower) at full throttle. This is a bona fide need on an engine that has sprouted a supercharger, but simply fitting a cooler thermostat to a stock engine will not lower the intake air temperature enough to matter and will not support a meaningful timing increase.

Cooler than 180-degree thermostats are not recommended on modern cars. Most domestic automakers’ engine-management systems go into open loop at 168 degrees F, meaning the engine is operating in its warm-up mode with perhaps an overly rich mixture and un-optimized ignition timing. Eventually the computer will consider such long warm-up times abnormal and could trip the Check Engine Light.

Furthermore, higher coolant temperatures promote engine efficiency, especially for fuel economy and emissions, and reduce cylinder wear (a cold block wears faster than a warm block), and the engine internal dimensions have been set for the designed operating temperature. If you’re really beating on your car in the summer and figure it’s overheating, then a 180-degree thermostat could be the answer to return your coolant temps to as-designed levels, but anything colder is counterproductive.



another related thought. If you are running an IC or going to, most rely on the radiator puller fan(s) to cool the FMHE. Typical fans settings with a 180* thermostat is 176 -182* whereas the stock fans settings with the 195* is 208 - 212*.
 
Back
Top