• The site migration is complete! Hopefully everything transferred properly from the multiple decades old software we were using before. If you notice any issues please let me know, thanks! Also, I'm still working on things like chatbox, etc so hopefully those will be working in the next week or two.

thrasher cam anyone use one

darkhorizon said:
You must have some magical rockers because I have never seen a rocker increase the lobe lift of a cam before.

The average chump running stock rockers and 130# springs on a TEP cam is going to see ~600-605 peak lift.
Click to expand...

Oh I'm sure....600 lift, makes logical sense.

.574/.566 = S1X + 1.8's....totally, lol.

Good thing I was talking about "peak" lift to begin with...guess I had to dumb it down for you.
 


bluegtp91 said:
Oh I'm sure....600 lift, makes logical sense.

.574/.566 = S1X + 1.8's....totally, lol.

Good thing I was talking about "peak" lift to begin with...guess I had to dumb it down for you.
Click to expand...

yea, about 574.. which is 25 less than a trasher, which makes sense...

What is the problem here cupcake?
 
darkhorizon said:
yea, about 574.. which is 25 less than a trasher, which makes sense...
Click to expand...

What did you just say here?

The "Thrasher Cam" they are selling now is no longer a .566/.566...its a .574/.566 on 1.6 rockers.

Also, an S1X makes what... .514/.526 peak...so...with 1.8 rockers...lol...

.577/.592...hmmm, seems that an S1X with 1.8's is quite larger than a Thrasher...

You, make no sense.

I made sense from the get go, like a boss.
 
I said VERY clearly why I am not proving how a stock rocker works. The numbers I came up with are of low precision and I am not going to spread a derived number around the internet, when I could build a rig with more precision to accurately measure it with different camshafts.

To come up with the numbers i came up with, I had to use quite a bit of calculus, and as I said before I always found peak ratio numbers on XP+ sized cams to be larger than 1.7 ratio. My specific numbers were actually very close to 1.8 on the NIC cam I tried to profile.

When dealing in .001 measurements, rig setup is very important... Mine sucked but it was accurate enough to give me a good start for my graphing calculator and give me an answer to some yes or no questions I was looking to answer in a specific setup.
 




You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top