Im with you there, Dodge is worthless here. But I prefer the Camaro, looks better in my opinion. Plus the ZL1 will be on-par with the Shelby quite possibly. And I could careless how "strong" of sales the Mustang could be, the point of getting the Camaro would be that you don't see one everyday (atleast here). I don't want a mustang for the peer fact that everyone around here has one, I go driving its "Oh look a mustang.... no second glance." Camaro goes by and im speechless looking at that sexy car, so many glances I could quite possibly get in a wreck over its beauty. :th_jester:
those are the tips, watch this YouTube - 2011 Chevrolet Camaro SLP ZL1 Convertible Track Test Video
edit: after some reading that is the SLP camaro. so WTH SLP
The retro Mustang is God awful hideous. The "retro" Camaro never should have been called a Camaro.
The only retro car that makes any sense is the Challenger.
The ZL1 is not supposed to be a Boss 302. What is with you people? ZL1 is going to make 550 HP atleast! The 5.0 L mustang engine makes 400 ish. I am failing to see what the problem is? The CHevy engine is bigger and is S/C making MORE power than the 5L N/A. Not tied.
The ZL1 is not supposed to be a Boss 302. What is with you people? ZL1 is going to make 550 HP atleast! The 5.0 L mustang engine makes 400 ish. I am failing to see what the problem is? The CHevy engine is bigger and is S/C making MORE power than the 5L N/A. Not tied.
Now A.) I was not talking about the 5.4L DOHC motor, I thought everyone was saying a Mustang GT with the 5L was making more power than the ZL1. And B.) I was not talking about the SS, this whole thread has been about the ZL1. So I apologize if I mis-read or mis-interpreted what was being said. And no worries Blue, GM will redo there engines some time. Its a constant game of countering. Otherwise no one would be in business.:th_jester:
I can't, word censors would crash the server.