dyno/tune vids 286whp 329wtq

[jim97regalgs]

Ok this was done on a mustang dyno. Runs were done in 2nd gear. I put down 286whp 329wtq. 19*timing, low 11s afr, 11ps1
i know the vids dont show much but she screams lol
first vid was calibrating rpms and testing the straps. 2nd was my 286whp 329wtq pull.

 

[Explicit_Spade]

Are the mods listed in your sig current?

Quoting for reference:
97 regal gs,L32 swap,vs cam,zzp fullsize ic,2.9mps,42.5lb inj,zzp polly mounts,custom 4" open cone intake,SD headers,fp rewire,stage1vb,alt rewire,wrapped crossover pipe,intense pcm,160 dr tstat,AL103's,3"mb exhaust,eibach springs,kyb struts,aem wide band,duel scanguages.

 

[jim97regalgs]

dyno slip pic

Facebook

 

[jim97regalgs]

Are the mods listed in your sig current?

Quoting for reference:
97 regal gs,L32 swap,vs cam,zzp fullsize ic,2.9mps,42.5lb inj,zzp polly mounts,custom 4" open cone intake,SD headers,fp rewire,stage1vb,alt rewire,wrapped crossover pipe,intense pcm,160 dr tstat,AL103's,3"mb exhaust,eibach springs,kyb struts,aem wide band,duel scanguages.

yes except now i have a zzp shift kit and lq4 maf

 

[Explicit_Spade]

I hope you don't take this the wrong way, but I think those numbers seem kind of low for your mods.

This is from ZZPerformance via Which Cam Should I Buy? | | ZZP NewsZZP News : Most users dyno 300WHP with the VS cam and intercooler before tuning with stock timing. With tuning users are reporting back averages of 320-330WHP

What octane gas are you using? Any known issues with the car?

 

[jim97regalgs]

I hope you don't take this the wrong way, but I think those numbers seem kind of low for your mods.

This is from ZZPerformance via Which Cam Should I Buy? | | ZZP NewsZZP News : Most users dyno 300WHP with the VS cam and intercooler before tuning with stock timing. With tuning users are reporting back averages of 320-330WHP

What octane gas are you using? Any known issues with the car?

yes well this was done on a mustang dyno wich always read low. i use this same dyno on all my cars and also use a dyno jet. and the difference between the is about 13%. so that would put me at your 320whp claim. 323whp 371wtq to be exact. mustang dynos have been called the heartbreaker. and for this very reason. running 93 octane.

 

[siLversLeigh]

They're just numbers. The strip is the real heartbreaker.

 

[SnowFlake]

yes well this was done on a mustang dyno wich always read low. i use this same dyno on all my cars and also use a dyno jet. and the difference between the is about 13%. so that would put me at your 320whp claim. 323whp 371wtq to be exact. mustang dynos have been called the heartbreaker. and for this very reason. running 93 octane.

This all depends on if the calibrations done beforehand are correct... in your case they seem right and your numbers look pretty respectable for your setup. The car likely runs very hard. Just tell people you make 280ish and let them scramble for excuses when their 350whp cars get smoked. Most people think inflating their whp numbers is impressive, I think the opposite is impressive

 

[jim97regalgs]

They're just numbers. The strip is the real heartbreaker.

True that. Well the car is deff faster than when I ran a 13.2@107mph. Only diff is I now have a good tune, lq4 maf, zzp shift kit and no header leak.
And ill be using my new set of nitto drags on modified 93 rx-7 fd rims wich only weigh 13.5lbs per rim. Should see some mid to low 12 sec passes.

 

[jim97regalgs]

This all depends on if the calibrations done beforehand are correct... in your case they seem right and your numbers look pretty respectable for your setup. The car likely runs very hard. Just tell people you make 280ish and let them scramble for excuses when their 350whp cars get smoked. Most people think inflating their whp numbers is impressive, I think the opposite is impressive

Could not agree more. But for posting on these forums I have to clarify these things. Lol