• The site migration is complete! Hopefully everything transferred properly from the multiple decades old software we were using before. If you notice any issues please let me know, thanks! Also, I'm still working on things like chatbox, etc so hopefully those will be working in the next week or two.

2000 gp se w/3800 vs Chevy Blazer 4.3L

Austin2000SE

New member
Okay so this kid at school was talking to me about how "Fast" his blazer is lol okay so ur driving a boat with a 4.3 okay haha hes like it would destroy ur pos and i laughed told him okay u think ur truck is soooo fast lets run em and put some money on this lol :th_thumbsup-wink: My car isnt all that fast ik but 3800 CAI Exhaust will beat ANY Stock Blazer MADE So gonna but 50$ up and ill have video to post on here hopefully tonight :th_biggrin2: GO GP!!
 


Don't under estimate an S-series....im not saying your gonna win or lose, and Im not bashing you, but I drive an 05 GMC Jimmy 4x4 2 door with a 4.3 and a 5 speed, and it moves along fairly well with only an airbox mod, drop in K&N, Dynomax RaceBullet muffler and 2.5" custom bent tailpipe.

Jay
 


relatively the same horsepower, the blazer weighs more if i had to guess. i raced an olds alero with a 3.4 in my old 4.3 s-10. jumped a full car off the line and i was spinning pretty bad. he spun a lot worse lol. but after that he was pulling ever so softly. i let off about 80, he was still inching on me, had a couple foot lead. 3.4's put out what, 170? i think my s-10 was in bad shape though, it also lost to a manual s-10 with the 2.8. he had a distinct weight advantage being made out of bondo and all. and he had a manual, when all i had was my fatass brother
 
will be pretty even. n/a engines are dogs. if its a rolling start he might take you.
 


we have to edjamakate dez kidz somehow blue

3371394724_5086beed51.jpg


Edumakate wit dat...or dis...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K7KH8Mhhb2U
 
if you are approximately doing 30.4 mph and the blazer is doing 30.2 this is going to throw of the calculation of pulses per second vs mass volume import status. Your going to have to eliminate all aspects of "inter calibration". When you eliminate all calibrations in your mediate inter aspects, this will get your approximate mph exactly the same. This way any interruption on impact will ultimately delete itself. This is the only way to succeed to get what you really want witch is in fact "outer needs of calibrations"
 
if you are approximately doing 30.4 mph and the blazer is doing 30.2 this is going to throw of the calculation of pulses per second vs mass volume import status. Your going to have to eliminate all aspects of "inter calibration". When you eliminate all calibrations in your mediate inter aspects, this will get your approximate mph exactly the same. This way any interruption on impact will ultimately delete itself. This is the only way to succeed to get what you really want witch is in fact "outer needs of calibrations"

I never really saw it that way...

what_a_twist.jpg
 
if you are approximately doing 30.4 mph and the blazer is doing 30.2 this is going to throw of the calculation of pulses per second vs mass volume import status. Your going to have to eliminate all aspects of "inter calibration". When you eliminate all calibrations in your mediate inter aspects, this will get your approximate mph exactly the same. This way any interruption on impact will ultimately delete itself. This is the only way to succeed to get what you really want witch is in fact "outer needs of calibrations"


You just took edjumacte to another leval.
 


Well i absolutely destroyed him oh and got his money im jus leaving for school now so ill post video after school his tires never spun mine did and i still had a jump on him we ran twice.:th_thumbsup-wink:
 
Back
Top