Was on a local forum and found this..IMO this person is CRAZY! Let me know if you agree with them.
Top 10 Cars That Don't Deserve Their Engines - Autoblog
|
Was on a local forum and found this..IMO this person is CRAZY! Let me know if you agree with them.
Top 10 Cars That Don't Deserve Their Engines - Autoblog
#9 = bs. Marauder is a nice ride
lol @ #2
Seriously??? That is the best they could do..... And near every one they said that they liked the car to top it off! They complain about car feel but how many people bought hi-po cars with ride and comfort as a priority? Most of those companies did what they could to keep themselves from sinking and offereing something above the norm. I bet the editor wouldnt cry if someone dropped a blown 502 in his 87 Caprice
Id take a Typhoon , and a Spirit r/t would be a sleeper on & off the track.
The SHO's were way ahead of their time, as far as 4 door 5 spd. They are also very good track cars with great suspension and always a good sound system. And wtf, they test almost all engines to hold under more rpms than what they set stock.. they are *****ing at a 7300rpm redline?
What should they have put the yamaha engines in?? Minivans?
Whoever wrote that is a complete utter f*cktard.
list is all wrong.
I have two friends who have Shelby Cars. One being a CSX and the other a Charger GLHS, talk about two cars you need diapers for lol!
That list is ridiculous
That list is bulls$#@ The guy who wrote this article has no idea what he is talking about.
He probably doesn't even drive a car or truck he has a shoffer drive him around thats why he doesnt know jack about them.
« Previous Thread | Next Thread » |
Tags for this Thread |