Why don't you just swap a VR4 engine. Block is capable of around 600. Stock is 320. Then tune and or upgrade turbos and you gain a lot more
|
that is a good point, they are torque monsters.... im just in love with that m90 whine.... i think switching to a different blower would cost even more than a straight turbo build...
i dont really care about numbers as much as results, i dont care if your smart car has 48 horsepower, a 10 second time slip is a 10 second time slip right?
my buddy has a 10 second vr4.... ill give them props on performace, but im not a big mitsu fan, or dodge.... i f ing hate dodge
i think part of the reason i wanna do it so bad is ive never seen one... maybe i just need to find someone with a twin chaged vehicle and drive it and get it out of my system... i mean it has to sound pretty damn awesome... especially running some openheaders... i might have to put a picture of my grandma on the dash so i dont get a woodie driving it.....
i have a feeling im going to end up sitting in an empty shell of a grand prix on a funny car chassis before this thread of over haha....
No far from that. People hit 500-600+ on stock bottom ends. Matt from ZZP did 750ish on his. This why you don't see very many rebuilds and most of the time a used block is dropped in. If 400hp was the breaking point turbo guys would build up a block before converting.
only reason why people stop making power supercharged is because the supercharger we have is lacking and turbo is a way more efficient power adder.
Um...no. At the track, with drag radials or slicks, I guarantee my twincharged car would destroy most turbo cars with the same internal mods. I only have a ST2 cam and 105# springs. If I was to upgrade to a ST5 cam, some ported heads, 130# springs, and up the boost to 20psi, I guarantee I would decimate mos, if not all turbo 3.8s out there (minus DarkHorizon who's Fiero weighs half of what a GP does )
The OP is right about how the power is distributed. The supercharger is there for low end power and it spools the bigger turbo faster. Most turbo GPs run a T61 turbo so it makes some power around 3500rpms. A properly setup twincharged setup (like mine) will be able to spin a larger turbo (T67 in my case) at around the same, if not lower, rpms. I'm at full spool at 3000rpms, and making a lot more power than a T61 would be making at those rpms.
WAY WAY WAY incorrect info here. The supercharger is NOT a restriction when it comes to a twincharged setup. It's a positive displacement blower, so it literally takes everything that is put in front of it and slings it into the motor. The best analogy I've heard is this: Think of the blower as a garbage can that can normally hold 50 gallons of trash. his is a normal GTP motor with the M90. Now, lets say you have a trash compactor and you put all of your trash into the compactor before you put i in the trash can. You can fit a lo more trash into the trash can after it's been compacted, right? This is how a twincharged setup works.
Also, spinning wheels is not something that should be corrected be limiting the power of the motor. Upgrading to better tires and learning how to launch a high powered car on the street is how you compensate for spinning wheels.
Cool story.
Buy a turbo kit and run it, sell your blower parts and then grenade your transmission.
Taking the time to make a proper twincharged setup is just dumb when you can have the same resluts if not better with just running a straight turbo.
Get me time slips and videos and then I'll believe, untill then, its just what you think it can do.Um...no. At the track, with drag radials or slicks, I guarantee my twincharged car would destroy most turbo cars with the same internal mods.
« Previous Thread | Next Thread » |
Tags for this Thread |