Thread: Dyno Science: "CAI" Box vs Open Cone Intake

Page 5 of 10 FirstFirst ... 34567 ... LastLast
Results 81 to 100 of 182
  1. #81 Re: Dyno Science: "CAI" Box vs Open Cone Intake 
    GTX Level Member
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Vancouver, WA
    Posts
    759
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by bluegtp91 View Post
    Because when your moving...it does sit within Ambient temp...my intake temps (when moving) never get more than 5*~ of what it is outside. I've never seen any interesting reasons to spend another $150+ to gain you nothing.

    Ricers race on the highway...which is why all of your videos you posted on here are highway runs

    I yank the headlight...and wait for it to be cooler before I go to the track anyways...I'd never waste money on a hot day.
    Well with my experience they are about 40* higher.

    Edit. Stupid stuff deleted.
    Last edited by footballplaya3k; 07-25-2011 at 12:44 AM.
    Slowest 'Cooled Gen V ever

    Reply With Quote  
     

  2. #82 Re: Dyno Science: "CAI" Box vs Open Cone Intake 
    SE Level Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Houston
    Posts
    7
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Humidity makes a big difference
    Reply With Quote  
     

  3. #83 Re: Dyno Science: "CAI" Box vs Open Cone Intake 
    GTX Level Member
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Vancouver, WA
    Posts
    759
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    I'm sick of my IAT's being 40* over ambient cruising and at the track so I will be putting my CAI back in next weekend hopefully. According to all the HAI humpers out there I should start running much more rich, correct? I am on a HAI tune that won't be changed. I am seeing a ~10.5 AFR right now. This should prove it once and for all, right?
    Slowest 'Cooled Gen V ever

    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #84 Re: Dyno Science: "CAI" Box vs Open Cone Intake 
    GTP Level Member 2001goldGTP's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    california
    Posts
    656
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    footballplaya, i have noticed a couple of things:

    1. every car is different.

    2. no matter what anyone finds to be true, there will always be someone else to say "no your wrong i dont care."
    xp'd
    Reply With Quote  
     

  5. #85 Re: Dyno Science: "CAI" Box vs Open Cone Intake 
    The Blue One blueguy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Dirtyzville, Missery
    Posts
    31,287
    Thanks (Received)
    1
    Likes (Received)
    2
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by footballplaya3k View Post
    I'm sick of my IAT's being 40* over ambient cruising and at the track so I will be putting my CAI back in next weekend hopefully. According to all the HAI humpers out there I should start running much more rich, correct? I am on a HAI tune that won't be changed. I am seeing a ~10.5 AFR right now. This should prove it once and for all, right?
    Hot Air Intake "tune"


    ...LOL
    Sold WBody's: '03 Blue GTP/'98 Green GTP/'98 Silver GT/'05 GXP
    '99 Chevrolet Silverado Classic Z71 4x4 - K&N Intake/Gibson Exhaust #TRUCKTHINGS
    '12 Buick Regal Turbo - ZZP CAI/20% Tint/HID's
    '89 Ford Mustang LX Notchback - LM7 5.3, 4L80, 9", HX40
    '04 Chevrolet Corvette MRM A4/LS1 - TSP LT's, 3"O/R X, AFE S2 CAI
    Reply With Quote  
     

  6. #86 Re: Dyno Science: "CAI" Box vs Open Cone Intake 
    I live here. SlowNA06's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Pennsylvania
    Posts
    5,928
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Whatever a gibby is tuned you rich, homie.
    Irridium spark plugs last 100k mi and work just as well as copper. Copper is a waste on N/A and only lasts 15k mi. Don't use Platinum.
    Use 195* tstat unless you can thoroughly explain why not; 99.9% don't need a lower temp.
    Almost any oil filter, ever, is of higher quality than ACDelco. Spend $6+.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  7. #87 Re: Dyno Science: "CAI" Box vs Open Cone Intake 
    GTX Level Member
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Vancouver, WA
    Posts
    759
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by bluegtp91 View Post
    Hot Air Intake "tune"


    ...LOL
    Exactly what I've been saying, I think its hilarious you guys think a CAI effects flow. So if it did effect flow you would need retuned for the BADAZZ HAI THAT MAKES TEH POWA, right? Lmao
    Slowest 'Cooled Gen V ever

    Reply With Quote  
     

  8. #88 Re: Dyno Science: "CAI" Box vs Open Cone Intake 
    GTX Level Member
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Vancouver, WA
    Posts
    759
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    I love how you guys totally divert from what my post was about lol
    Slowest 'Cooled Gen V ever

    Reply With Quote  
     

  9. #89 Re: Dyno Science: "CAI" Box vs Open Cone Intake 
    DUI BABY Bio248's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    MILWAUKEE
    Posts
    31,340
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    1
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    your tune shouldnt change from an intake change. you running a 10.5 AFR is your tune being ****ty. get it retuned correctly and try again.

    also, you're not on a pulley that requires an open cone, but the second you breach the 3.0 realm an open cone is a much better option since you KNOW there is no restriction in the intake.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  10. #90 Re: Dyno Science: "CAI" Box vs Open Cone Intake 
    GTX Level Member
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Vancouver, WA
    Posts
    759
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    We never finished my tune, I had a fuel line bust, that's why my AFR is so rich. It's a chit ton better than it was before though when it was in the 9's. Also my tune is for my 3.4" that was on.

    Bio, I don't plan on going that small. Key word plan.
    Slowest 'Cooled Gen V ever

    Reply With Quote  
     

  11. #91 Re: Dyno Science: "CAI" Box vs Open Cone Intake 
     

  12. #92 Re: Dyno Science: "CAI" Box vs Open Cone Intake 
    GTX Level Member
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Vancouver, WA
    Posts
    759
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Just like I told myself I'd never go past a 3.4 setup lol
    Slowest 'Cooled Gen V ever

    Reply With Quote  
     

  13. #93 Re: Dyno Science: "CAI" Box vs Open Cone Intake 
    Awaiting Confirmation
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    aowdnawi
    Posts
    23,292
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    1
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    I honestly do not understand why your IAT's are so high once moving.

    How much of the plastic cowling do you still have in the front behind the bumper cover?
    Reply With Quote  
     

  14. #94 Re: Dyno Science: "CAI" Box vs Open Cone Intake 
    SE Level Member comengetit's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    33
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    I have a delema....i had tomaro planned out for a "simple intake" mod with a spectre 4" cone filter. then i started thinkn. now i dont have any mods n one of the first ones they say to do is the intake. i can see no problem there....as long as u do the headers and a pcm. but what if i dont have the ability to drop the loot for all three at once? when i raced MX if we messed with the air filter, i had to retune the jetting on my yfz. my dad has a 400hp gsx and he tunes with dsm link off of a laptop(ya....a ricer lol). now when he floors it the computer is no longer in play....its all about his tune setup. well what about me???? i cant tune or monitor anything. when i floor my gtp after completly changing my intake from stock design....wont i be leaning my car out? does opening up our intakes not allow more air into it causing factory tunes to be leaned out? if not, if my gtp can handle this change with no negative results...then im installing my "HAI" tomaro. Does anyone know the truth behind this?
    Reply With Quote  
     

  15. #95 Re: Dyno Science: "CAI" Box vs Open Cone Intake 
    GTP Level Member 2001goldGTP's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    california
    Posts
    656
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Band me if you must/want but im tired of this bs, a boosted car with access to any air will suck in as much air as it can. 9psi is 9psi since our cars run hot the colder temp is what we want. If you don't have enough air drop a pulley size. Since most people cant flow a stock gen 3 m90 on a 3.25 I vote for the cai to save what pain we put these motors through, but what the **** do I know I only have a degree in mechanical engineering so I must be dumb.
    xp'd
    Reply With Quote  
     

  16. #96 Re: Dyno Science: "CAI" Box vs Open Cone Intake 
    Banned
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Mansfield, Ohio
    Posts
    745
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Mechanical Engineering degree ='s "band me"

    An intake is an intake in the overall realm of things who cares......... I know one thing if I had an engineering degree I wouldn't drive a GTP
    Reply With Quote  
     

  17. #97 Re: Dyno Science: "CAI" Box vs Open Cone Intake 
    GTX Level Member
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Vancouver, WA
    Posts
    759
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by matt5112 View Post
    I honestly do not understand why your IAT's are so high once moving.

    How much of the plastic cowling do you still have in the front behind the bumper cover?
    Sorry i missed this matt. i have no idea why their so high, ive just accepted that HAI's are chit unless you have no other choice like me. there are just lots of lies that people believe about how "good" they are. IAT's dropped to about 30* over since I partially stuffed my filter in my fender well but I don't expect it to get any better. I have removed quite a bit of the plastic cowl crap, probably a lil too much.
    Slowest 'Cooled Gen V ever

    Reply With Quote  
     

  18. #98 Re: Dyno Science: "CAI" Box vs Open Cone Intake 
    Banned
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Mansfield, Ohio
    Posts
    745
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by footballplaya3k View Post
    Sorry i missed this matt. i have no idea why their so high, ive just accepted that HAI's are chit unless you have no other choice like me. there are just lots of lies that people believe about how "good" they are. IAT's dropped to about 30* over since I partially stuffed my filter in my fender well but I don't expect it to get any better. I have removed quite a bit of the plastic cowl crap, probably a lil too much.
    You realize though if it's 95* outside anyways you're still sucking in 95* air while moving with a CAI. Cold air intakes may be better, may not be better, when moving I've noticed IAT's about 15-20* over ambient. I don't know to many people making horsepower while sitting at a stoplight with their cold air intake, it is what it is......
    Reply With Quote  
     

  19. #99 Re: Dyno Science: "CAI" Box vs Open Cone Intake 
    GTX Level Member
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Vancouver, WA
    Posts
    759
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    All I know is I was happy with my 6* of KR drop on my 3.4 setup when I went to a CAI over a HAI. That's all the proof I needed.
    Slowest 'Cooled Gen V ever

    Reply With Quote  
     

  20. #100 Re: Dyno Science: "CAI" Box vs Open Cone Intake 
    Awaiting Confirmation
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    aowdnawi
    Posts
    23,292
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    1
    Dislikes (Received)
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by footballplaya3k View Post
    All I know is I was happy with my 6* of KR drop on my 3.4 setup when I went to a CAI over a HAI. That's all the proof I needed.
    No KR in sight here.

    Can't see over 10 PSI being good either.
    Reply With Quote  
     

Page 5 of 10 FirstFirst ... 34567 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Any way to quiet down an intake during the "warm up" stage?
    By nickbuol in forum 3.8L V6 Supercharged (L67)(L32)
    Replies: 41
    Last Post: 08-26-2009, 01:37 PM
  2. "Check CD" or "error reading cd"
    By pontiacprincess in forum Audio, Security & Visual Electronics
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 04-04-2009, 08:22 PM
  3. Powrtuner website now "mostly" open to all members
    By JEFFSGTP in forum Site/Club News
    Replies: 22
    Last Post: 01-23-2009, 09:41 PM
  4. "Cutting the intake box" on a GTP
    By Freebeer187 in forum General Tech Discussion
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 06-20-2008, 12:41 PM
Tags for this Thread

View Tag Cloud

Bookmarks
Bookmarks
Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •